HomeResearch LibraryMitigating LLM Hallucinations Using a Multi-Agent Frame…
Chapter 3 · 2025

Mitigating LLM Hallucinations Using a Multi-Agent Framework

Siddharth Singh, Siddharth Singh, Siddharth Singh

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in generating human-like text, but they often suffer from "hallucinations," producing factually incorrect or nonsensical information. This issue severely limits their reliability and applicability in critical domains. This paper proposes a novel multi-agent framework to detect and mitigate hallucinations in LLMs. Our framework employs a collaborative system of specialized agents, each responsible for a specific aspect of verification, such as factual consistency, logical coherence, and contextual relevance. By cross-referencing information and leveraging collective intelligence, the multi-agent system can identify and correct hallucinated content more effectively than single-model approaches.

Eigenvector Insight — Zone III / PASF-PADE AnalysisNot part of the original paper
Eigenvector Research — Marco van Hurne
How this paper contributes to solving the Zone III problem (PASF-PADE)

This paper directly addresses one of the core structural challenges in Zone III deployments. The research on LLM Hallucination, Multi-Agent Systems, Hallucination Mitigation provides evidence-based foundations that enterprise architects cannot ignore when designing long-horizon autonomous workflows. The findings challenge the assumption that a base language model — however capable — can handle the complexity of durable, governed, multi-step execution without explicit architectural intervention. For Zone III practitioners, this paper belongs in the required reading list.

Why AI is not sufficient for Zone III without this

Zone III refers to high-complexity, high-risk, long-running agentic workflows — the class of enterprise AI deployments where a single failure can cascade across hundreds of steps. Standard AI models, trained to predict the next token, are not inherently designed for durable, governed, multi-step execution. This paper addresses one or more of the structural gaps that make Zone III deployments unsafe without explicit architectural intervention.

Topics

LLM HallucinationMulti-Agent SystemsHallucination MitigationFactual ConsistencyReliability